ken

I HATE LIBERAL FASCISTS

Comments

I would join your blog but there is no button to punch. Keep up the good work! I am a liberal conservative hater of Nazis and fascists, on whichever side of the aisle they slime around.
you sound like just the kind of person i want in this group.if you care to reconsider.just find my blog look in my groups and pick the one that fits you best
Of course intolerance is toxic no matter what ideology it's coming from. We should have a free exchange of ideas. But a simple disagreement, or critique of arguments, is not always a threat to freedom. If we all make sure we're constructive and respectful, and avoid ad hominem attacks, we should be able to get along despite our differences of opinion on some issues.
what is boiling my blood is the liberal''fascist'' attacks on the likes of the old miss california and sarah palin.conservatives are always being brow beat by the p.c. police,we are not open minded enough to see their arguments we are not sensative enough to hear their cry's.but their weapon of choice is a full on attack with no remorse to anybody that doesn't believe in whatever''liberal'' agenda they are trying to force on everyone else..
I have no problem with people holding conservative views. I have never said anything about Miss California. I do disagree with her views, but she's entitled to her views. I agree it was unfair for people to verbally crucify her like they did. It really went beyond the bounds of civility.

As for Sarah Palin, I have no respect for her. She talks about conservativism, but doesn't practice those values. She's simply an self-serving, faithless liar. Criticizing her for that is not a criticism of the conservative movement. Calling her to task is not being politically correct. It's calling a spade a spade.
so if we stay in this vein of calling things what they are, how do you feel about the free passes obama has been getting,or how about sotomeyer's comments about the way she judges,and the recent reversal of her discrimanation case,is this a two way street,or is it ok for minority's to be racist or sexist
Sure, it's legitimate to question Judge Sonia Sotomayor's comment during a discussion of racial or sex discrimination cases that a latina woman would be able to make better judgments than a white male who hasn't lived through discrimination. Her wording is subject to misinterpretation, and so it was poorly chosen. But to give her the benefit of the doubt, it was not part of a legal opinion, it was part of a discussion. By all accounts, her legal work has been of high quality.

Also, in response to these questions, she has recently clarified that a judge follows the law regardless of personal background.

Regarding the recent reversal, from what I've read, Sotomayor joined a ruling that followed prior rulings of her circuit. Far from being "activist" judges, the panel on which Sotomayor participated seems to have made an honest effort to respect what little precedent there was in this matter.

The US Supreme Court made a 5-4 decision, which added clarification to the Civil Rights Act. That's an appropriate thing for the Supreme Court to do -- but it wouldn't have been appropriate for the District Court to make that kind of interpretation.

Anyway, it's kind of reaching if one sees the Supreme Court ruling as any kind of condemnation of Sotomayor, if only because that ruling was from a three-judge panel, and their ruling was unanimous.

of racial or sex discrimination cases that a latina woman would be able to make better judgments than a white male who hasn't lived through discrimination.

Bill...are you FOR REAL!!?? White MEN, in particular ARE the ones that are discriminated against TO THE MAX.

Read: SOTOMAYOR the RACIST THROWS INNOCENT WHITE MEN TO JAIL AND PRISON FOR LIFE!!!!!!

And OPEN YOUR EYES, and STOP SHITTING on YOUR OWN. There is MORE on this bitch btw.. She is a white hating MAGGOT, and I see you are WHITE...well, you'll get what you DESERVE.

As for Sarah Palin, I have no respect for her. She talks about conservativism, but doesn't practice those values. She's simply an self-serving, faithless liar.

Examples Please. Are you a Conservative or how would you define yourself?

The Jeff Deskovic story is sad and unjust, certainly. But Judge Sotomayor was not involved in his 1990 conviction. And it was then District Attorney Jeanine Pirro, who later denied Deskovic's requests to reopen the case based on DNA evidence. So is Jeanine Pirro racist? Are the judge, jury, and prosecuting attorney involved in his conviction racist?

Judge Sotomayor seems to be involved in this story only briefly in 2000, after Deskovic's lawyer mistakenly filed his habeas corpus appeal after the deadline, and he was petitioning for an exception to the deadline. Sotomayor -- along with a second judge -- denied that petition for deadline extension. It's really far-fetched to conclude their decision was motivated by racial discrimination.

"To hear that a judge who put procedure over innocence could be moving to a higher court is very upsetting to me," [Deskovic] said. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/10/nyregion/10dna.html

So Jeffrey Deskovic himself recognizes that this was an application of procedure that didn't go his way -- it was NOT an instance of racial discrimination. Though I can understand his frustration, because the impact of that choice caused him to stay in prison for six more years.

Frankly, your assertions that this is an instance of anti-white racism are unsupported by the facts.
Examples Please.

There are dozens of well-researched articles about Sarah Palin's treachery and her egotism. If you haven't seen any of these, you've been living in a cave for the past year.

Are you a Conservative or how would you define yourself?

My point is that even conservatives -- especially conservatives -- should reject Sarah Palin as a false prophet.
Ken is a bit of a troll (the original name of the group is I Blocked Ken) and some of the conservatives here are a bit overbearing. I guarantee you won't get an example out of Ken, sadly.

Take a look in the mirror Ken, sheesh. Your comments alone are filled with insults and attacks. Neither side is innocent here. Not all of us, but many of us have "attacked with weapons" to use your melodramatic words. At least own up to the fact that the Conservatives here are just as rude as some of us are. You need look no further than your own comments or those of Mad Jewess. At least I've never called anyone a Bitch.

Try civil conversation or at least stop being such a hypocrite.

my example of sotomeyer are her own words and her record of overturned cases they stand on their own,if anything she is the democratic,bork, and should never be seated on the supreme court.that the group you sight is founded by a over reactive liberal that trolls just about every blog on vox is the point i'm trying to make.there are way to many liberal ''fascist'' out there that are so sure they are right they are willing to break every rule, insult any idea, and shout down anyone that doesn't agree with them.

''her legal work has been of high quality''

80% of her cases that go to appeal have been overturned,she made a glaring mistake with the new haven, descision.and the more they dig into her past the more they are finding more racist and sexist groups that she has or still belongs to.this is a liberal ''fascist'' that will be deciding the fate of america for twenty or thirty years.if you want a liberal on the court replace her with a souter or a ginsberg but this sotomeyer is over the top and doesn't support most people's view of america and what it could be..

There are dozens of well-researched articles about Sarah Palin's treachery and her egotism.

Where is the LINK? What is the title and location of just one well-researched article that substantiates your charge? Saying so does not make it so.

Are you a Conservative or how would you define yourself?


My point is that even conservatives -- especially conservatives --

You did not answer the question, you are just telling others what to do.

I know it is difficult, but click on you link overbearing. What do you see. That's O.K.. Do enjoy your freedom to express yourself in any way you wish. This is after all The United States of America.
that judges just don't follow the law,they make the law.and on the supreme court even more so.that 9 of the best legal minds of our country almost never come to a 9-0 descision proves that point.again i don't see this pick as being the right one,that she was even considered after some of her mistakes is proof that obama is making way to many mistakes,half of his cabinet,his replacement in the senate,and now a racist ,sexist judge.hopefully lady bork never get's in...

Well, you are a FENCE SITTER, Ellie.

NOBODY likes a FENCE SITTER.

You think that HONESTY is rudeness..... whatever, come and live in NYC, sweet pea.

Ellie, just out of curiousity...whats the name of my blog??

Answer:

THE MAD JEWESS

So, dont expect me to kiss your fence sitting ASS.

Oh, are you full of sh*t or WHAT?!

Jeff was INNOCENT, and speaks about it TO THIS DAY.

Look at these damned liberals, taking up for ANYBODY, BUT innocent people.

You make me SICK, Bill. Totally SICK. I am tired of you LIARS that say you 'champion' for the little people, what total BULLSH*T!

Bolshevik excrement.

Wow. That was unexpected.

I have no idea what part of my post deserved that level of venom and abuse.

The complaints in this group about "liberal fascists" are really sounding ironic.
that alot of conservatives are resorting to liberal levels should not come as any surprise,that you just defended the judge that could have made a difference and righted a wrong,and said she was right in making this desicion is enough to anger the most level headed person.this is the reason i enjoy ann coulter so much, she has decided to jump down into the sewer with the ''liberal fascist's'' and wrestle with the devil in his own surroundings.
Okay I see. Judge Sotomayor chooses not to give special consideration to Deskovic's incompetent lawyer, and so she's now a racist.

Meanwhile, you enjoy a bigot like Ann Coulter "so much" while she makes a career spewing her unconscionable hate speech.

This is surreal. Please do not contact me again.

You did not answer my questions, you jumped in here and defamed Governor Palin and provided no examples. Then you defame Conservatives and provide no proof of what you speak.

Then, you call Ann Coulter a bigot. If she is a bigot, then you are a bigot for calling her a bigot.

Judge Sotomayor is a racist, because she said she was. Are you stuck on stupid or what, can't you read or listen to her own words.

What a mind numbed robot. Political ideology above fact.

ann coulter a bigot in what way,she might be predjudiced against liberals but i can't say i blame her.sotomeyer is a racist by her own words,that she makes other mistakes is just another nail in the coffin.and if you feel that strongly in your blind defence of this moraless judge just don't reply i can always here your rhetoric on msnbc..

Name on way in which I'm "on the fence".

My dear, I've responded to every single one of your comments on abortion, gay marriage etc and you're too much of a coward to respond. You leave me hanging every time. It's you who's a lightweight, not me.

What does living in NYC have to do with being tough?? I lived in Boston when I was 19 years old, unless you're homeless it's a piece of cake. Sheesh, where do you come from? Try living in a tent sometime, girlfriend. See how long you last.

Ken shame on you for attacking Ken's daughter and telling her to lose weight. She's 20 years old for cripes sake - get a life.
I meant to say Kirk's daughter - sorry.
ellie,shes a 20 year old with a potty mouth and she ran it at me.
Please understand, I was invited to join this group by Ken. Ken also brought up Sarah Palin, so I shared my opinion about her as briefly as I could. Ken also brought up Ann Coulter.

By the way, to qualify as "defamation," the statements are usually required to be false. So I think you're using that term incorrectly.

Sarah Palin is a self-serving liar. She lines her pockets with public money and fails to pay taxes on it. She uses the governor's office on a personal vendetta, gets caught, and then makes false assertions about being cleared of wrongdoing. She racks up well over $150K in extravagant wardrobe expenses, shocking her campaign supporters who footed the bill, and then a Republican Party lawyer went to Alaska to retrieve the garments still in her possession.

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/sarah-palin200908

Ann Coulter is a disgusting bigot, a wanna-be shock jock. Even conservative allies like Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani condemn her use of hate-tinged slurs, and her only defense is "C'mon it was a joke." In this context, the selective outrage over Judge Sotomayor's comments about being a wise latina woman falls flat.

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASUS_12/5149_12.htm
http://www.counterpunch.org/nimmo02112005.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,256526,00.html

Vanity Fair, your source. Any pretense that you have a brain has been removed.

Every one of your charges against Governor Palin are false. I don't have time to refute each one right now, but I will if you need it. Go HERE and go thru the archives and all the truth will be explained.

More on Judge Sotomayor: I'm not a supporter of her as a Supreme Court nominee. I'm neutral on that nomination.

I was just responding to the assertions that she is a racist, which seem to center around three perceived faults:

- A remark she made during a discussion about judging in cases of sex and race discrimination, which she later clarified. There is no suggestion of any inappropriate legal judgment.

- Her slight involvement in the appeal procedures of a wrongly-convicted man. Her decision was shared by another judge. I am not aware of any evidence or reason to believe that her decision was related to the race of the applicant.

- Her overturned opinion on a Title VII case. Her opinion was shared by both of the other judges on her panel, and four justices on the Supreme Court, so it doesn't seem likely that her opinion was out of bounds.

I'm still neutral on her nomination, but on these specific instances, I think the allegations of racism are not supported. As JBodine said earlier, "saying so does not make it so."
The article in Vanity Fair was written by Todd Purdum, the national editor of that magazine. His bio says he is an award-winning journalist, and worked for 23 years at the New York Times.

The VF article is not the only source. I also included links to ABC News, Time Magazine, Alaska Daily News, The Atlantic, Newsweek, and the LA Times. Did you not notice the links? Here they are in plain text:

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/the-twelve-odd.html
http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/story/521329.html
http://www.adn.com/palin/story/693695.html
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1849399,00.html
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/palin-makes-tro.html
http://www.newsweek.com/id/167581/page/1
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-palin6-2008nov06,0,5597211.story

that what we have to judge this judge by is her words and her rulings.she not only stated her beliefs that a latino women can judge better then a white male,she said it again about 6 monthes later.that she could have seen the unfairness about the new haven case and stood up for everyone and not just some people is part of the problem.that she belongs to racist and sexist groups is just more of the same racist ideals that she seems proud of. and again the underlying premise that she has some special insight to judge by is racist,alot of people could and have come to the same desicion but didn't do it with her frame of mind ,and her frame of mind is what is in question here,and what future rulings she might pass down for the next twenty or thirty years
Thank you, that was a well-stated reply. I think you have made good points and I share some of those concerns about her rhetoric and her approach. It will be interesting to hear what comes out in the Senate confirmation hearings.
ellie i replyed to kirk and his daughter in his own mother tounge,that he tried to paint his daughter as a angel ,is what confused me ,the very first comment i got from this girl was gutter speak,i felt no need to spare her feelings because she had already showed she had none.that the comment kirk is using was for the most part meant as a joke and a reaction to her over reaction escaped both of them and if you consider how smart kirk wants to paint himself as being,the only reason for him not seeing that is he turned a blind eye to it.again i will say this is just another showing of his ''liberal fascist '' mind at work,he has no idea of how his comments look ,but wants all of his comments to be met with sensativity and compassion.kirk is very proud of his degree from a second rate college and he's not afraid to tell everybody about it.that he points to a book from a writer who is now considered mostly wrong and stunted in his thinking,points to the fact that he doesn't understand that ''crime and punishment'' was at first seen as a rust spot in the iron curtain and exploited for that reason.that he now has blocked me ,shows that when he doesn't get to have his way,andthere isn't enough giggles in it for him he opts out and runs back to the merry go round.i have no respect for his brand of thinking and the dead ends that it will lead to..

Ken all I can say is that if you don't like someone, ignore them. If some 20 year old young woman is being petty, block her from your blog. You should only respond to someone that young if you're also a 20 year old girl, which you're not. If you consider someone to be acting immature, when you get down to their level it makes you look twice as immature.

At your age it just makes you look demented and dangerous. You need to smarten up.

i know many 20 somethings that are completely capable of defending themselves,if this was my daughter of nephew or neice she would have gotten more of a earfull.when i was twenty or younger there was no shortage of older people that were more then eager to comment on my every word,again that kirk tried to use it the way he did shows his lack of decency alot more then mine.
Just my advice, ken. Take it or leave it.
Hell yes, I blocked you. I'm so tired of you I blocked you even though you caused my t-shirt sales to go through the roof last night. No kidding. I made BANK because of your insipid vitriol. People came, saw you being a hater, watched me repeatedly hand you your ass, and then decided to support me by opening their wallets and purchasing a t-shirt with my blog's logo emblazoned on the front. But I don't need the money so badly that I want to keep torturing my readers, so you're out. Blocked. Bye, bye.

What did you get besides derision?

"i felt no need to spare her feelings"

That's fine and I think we already knew that by your childish methods. But, see, you didn't hurt her feelings, ken. You made her realize there are grown men who act like crybabies (she's not used to men acting like you). I mean, you ridiculed her acne, for crying out loud. That's nothing short of pitiful and had no absolutely effect on her. I raised my daughter to be more secure in herself than that and to see what a real man is. Real men can spell. Real men are secure in themselves. Real men don't tease girls about their skin and hair. Lonely, hateful losers do that sort of thing. But tell yourself whatever you need to.

Now, ken, this is where you say, "that you dont realize your the pursen whos is not a reel mankirk, is escapes you then you are the hatful losser." Or something like that; I don't speak imbecile.
"ellie i replyed to kirk and his daughter in his own mother tounge"
Hey, I thought your pet name for ellie was "smellie". That's what you so callously called her at my blog. Funny how you have a completely different voice and persona here (and ironic considering that's a crime you accused me of).

But hey, at least you've adopted several phrases you got from me. It would be flattering if you weren't such a tool, but I'm happy to know you've at least learned some new words. Now, learn to spell them. It's "t-o-n-g-u-e".
Feh, I was done with ken a while back, but then he posted pics from his Florida trip, he posted a nice egret photo and called the bird a "liberal". Made self-depricating remarks. I thought he could change and be a reasonable person. I care because we are going to be railroaded by our govt if we don't de-polarize so to speak. It's a huge problem. But clearly ken is not fit to change. I give up.
[this is good]
I am a liberal, and I have no egrets about it! :-)

(or has that joke already been done?)

That's nothing to crow about. Har har.

:D

Those are the same sources nobody reads or views because they can not be trusted. Aren't they the same sources that told us Obama was not a marxist.

Isn't Obama the same tool that said he would not raise taxes, any taxes on any one making less that 250,000.00. Right out of the gate he raised cigarette taxes, who smokes. That's right the poor. Did the press tell you about it and call him a liar.

I told you all of your charges are untrue, False, not true.

You state affirmatively that Governor Palin committed crimes. Non of your sources go that far, they only couch them.

Okay, now you're just embarrassing yourself.
kirk your a joke within a joke, you made money, you had your fun and you taught your daughter how to be a liberal lowlife.now run along and play.maybe when your older you'll learn how to defend yourself in a grown up way...real men know how to spell??? is that like real men eat quiche????why is it most english majors and prof. are border line insane. is there something about learning that english in not a exact science that just throws you overboard,or did you start out that way.either way you have no morals or sense of reality.bye bye and buy bonds.
kirk,your use of the word ironic is ironic,and tiresome,go eat some liver and onions and come back when your feeling better.
Emily Postnews had this to say about spelling way back in 1988:

Q: I cant spell worth a dam. I hope your going too tell me what to do?


A: Don't worry about how your articles look. Remember it's the message that counts, not the way it's presented. Ignore the fact that sloppy spelling in a purely written forum sends out the same silent messages that soiled clothing would when addressing an audience.


Bill...tell us all of your education of La Raza, Sotomayor, the INNOCENT white men that she has PUT IN PRISON, the CT Firefighters that got JUSTICE because of the RACIST B*tch, Sotomayor. For a white dude, you certainly hate your own. Your hatred of being a white guy AINT gonna save you, when the 'minorities' are in the streets rioting after they find out that Obama is a LIAR, with a 31% "strongly approval' rating as of Rasmussen today.

Go look at this: (if you DARE)

www.mexica-movement.org

You liberals need to WAKE THE HELL UP- bigtime. Your $$ AINT gonna save your ass when there is NO food in HUSSEIN Obamas depression, that even Biden is talking about.....FOR A CHANGE!

yea well i'm working on it.i never did like emily post,just didn't seem like she would be any fun at a bbq.

"kirk,your use of the word ironic is ironic,and tiresome,go eat some liver and onions"

I didn't really know what to make of this bizarre sentence yesterday. Liver and onions? Wha? What the hell does that have to do with anything?

Then it donned on me: you have absolutely no idea what "ironic" means. Liver is remarkably high in iron. Iron - Irony. Ha ha ha! You think it has something to do with iron. BTW, liver is actually considered not so healthy for you (especially men) anymore. It is the body's garbage filter after all. Maybe you'd feel better if you stopped eating it. Just a thought.
Oh, and one more thing:

Your silly buzz-term "liberal fascist" is an oxymoron. To wit:

fas-cist: -noun, a person who is dictatorial or has extreme right-wing views.

right wing: -noun, members of a conservative political party.

left wing: -noun, members of a liberal political party.

So you see, saying "Liberal Fascist" is like saying "Atheist Christian" or "Humanitarian Hitler" or "Clever Troll".

That's enough for now. Time for recess. Run along and play.
kirk,kirk,kirk, that you almost unwrapped my joke is amazing.for anybody that doesn't know,kirk seems to have appointed himself my official stalker,he follows me around on vox looking for ammo to write yet another ''scathing'' post on ,you quessed it ,me. this time he even went so far as to steal a picture off my blog. now kirk. seeing as your so fond of wikipedia,go there and find their ideas on the word ''fascist''it seems it has many meanings to many people,for the most part it is someone who demands that his way is the only way to the exclusion of all else,which is how most liberals act.they are all for whatever ''freedom'' they are demanding,and will relentlesly attack anyone that will tell them they are wrong and keep them from their ''freedom'' which most of the time means someone else's freedom being taken from them.so again kirk,you fail to see beyond the end of your own nose.the term stands and you fit it to a ''t'' you quirk are a ''liberal fascist''...i want my picture back or just keep it and the proof that you are a liar,fool and theif can be there for anyone to see.
Sorry, man. I'll leave you alone. It's just that when I realized the iron-irony thing, I couldn't resist. Come on, though; you can't really call me a stalker if you invite me.

For the record, I've never stated I want everything my way and no other way. I only want true equality and freedom. Fascism is the opposite of that, so I'm no fascist. For example, I want people to be able to join in a civil union with whomever they're in love with, regardless of gender. That's giving freedom, not taking it.

Anyway, I intended to take down the posts and pix concerning you, and I will do so. I've made my point, you and I have reached an impasse, and there's really no reason to keep this up. I've no desire to archive our exchange at CimC, nor do I see either of us changing our minds on our disagreements.

One last suggestion, if I may: you should pluralize "fascist" so it's "I Hate Liberal Fascists". Having the word singular makes no sense whatsoever. It's just one letter. Add it. You'll thank me.

Take care.
just about anybody with a rational mind want's liberty and freedom,some of them don't want the responsibilty that goes with it.fascism,is the tool of a closed mind liberal or conservative.you used my pictures and made money off the attention you got,i will consider that repayment for my bet.what you do with them now,short of selling them to a porno site is up to you....when i see somrthing in a public area that a disagree with or agree with, i leave a comment,as you can see by my blog i have never really shut anybody out,including dancing bears sexual come on's.i will keep blogging about things that i feel passonate and i'm sure someone will come along and tell me when they think i'm wrong,or even right.

God yes Ken. You are such a fine specimen that I lay awake at night wishing you were with me.

I'm trying to show you what you sound like to me. Ugly and shallow and without meaning.

I have a really nice looking boyfriend. Been together almost 20 years. I think he is safe that I won't leave him for you. I thought about it but then I figured brains and good looks meant more to me than smashing beer cans on my head while watching Mamas Family.

I do like cheetos though so maybe we'll get together one day. But you don't want me anymore now that you have Paulette. She's all woman Ken. More meat than Anne Coulter but she at least was born a woman. I think.

cmon dancing bear, just one picture of you dressed up as a cuban gay dancing bear,with the cheap cigar,fezz,and bear skin rug and i will send you all my cheetos

fas⋅cism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [fash-iz-uhm] Show IPA

–noun 1. a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism

fas·cism (fāsh'ĭz'əm)
n.

often Fascism A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government. Oppressive, dictatorial control.

Word History: It is fitting that the name of an authoritarian political movement like Fascism, founded in 1919 by Benito Mussolini, should come from the name of a symbol of authority. The Italian name of the movement, fascismo, is derived from fascio, "bundle, (political) group," but also refers to the movement's emblem, the fasces, a bundle of rods bound around a projecting axe-head that was carried before an ancient Roman magistrate by an attendant as a symbol of authority and power. The name of Mussolini's group of revolutionaries was soon used for similar nationalistic movements in other countries that sought to gain power through violence and ruthlessness, such as National Socialism.

Uh..."Fairness Doctrine?" (Schmuck Schumer saying that he is going to STOP conservative talk radio, that is DICTATORIAL) Uhh..HUSSEIN Obama OWNS the CAR CO'S and BANKS..Hello KIRK,,,anybody IN THERE??

HUSSEIN Obama RAN a campaign BASED ON RACISM. Uhh "She was a TYPICAL WHITE WOMAN" His Pastor, on and on about RACE. HUSSEIN Obama and his cabal are oppressing tyrants, you dont see it, because you are very brainwashed, much as the GOP was when Bush was in power for 5 1/2 years, EXCEPT the GOP NEVER had 'complete and total power' but they do now, total and complete control and most of you MORONS still think there is GOP there. Ths BLATANT STUPIDITY of the LEFTIST fascist shits is INCOMPREHENSIBLE

The DEMS have 60 seats and are FILIBUSTER proof, which means they will do what they want to do, and F**K you, if YOU, little PEON if you dont like it.

HUSSEIN Obama has THIRTY TWO Czars (32). More than ANY OTHER admin. in the history of the United States, CZAR is a COMMUNIST term that means ABSOLUTE POWER, THAT is what HUSSEIN Obama is doing, and you are a damned DOLT.

Kirk, when you have NO food, dont come crying to ME, b/c I PROMISE that I will tell you:

I TOLD YOU SO.

ya just gotta love her... thank you mad jewess
ken, I told you I was going to leave you alone, and I meant it. You can stop baiting me now.

I never really expected any money from you in the first place; it was just a method by which I could bust your chops. That's all. You can relax about the photos, too. I don't even have them anymore. I've sort of moved on.

Oh, hey, kudos on taking my advice on pluralizing "fascist" in your post title. But, man, you gotta remove the apostrophe. Never add an apostrophe when pluralizing. Ever. People do it all the time and it sucks. Anyway, take that out and you've got it.

FASCISM:

Uh..."Fairness Doctrine?" (Schmuck Schumer saying that he is going to STOP conservative talk radio, that is DICTATORIAL) Uhh..HUSSEIN Obama OWNS the CAR CO'S and BANKS..Hello KIRK,,,anybody IN THERE??

HUSSEIN Obama RAN a campaign BASED ON RACISM. Uhh "She was a TYPICAL WHITE WOMAN" His Pastor, on and on about RACE. HUSSEIN Obama and his cabal are oppressing tyrants, you dont see it, because you are very brainwashed, much as the GOP was when Bush was in power for 5 1/2 years, EXCEPT the GOP NEVER had 'complete and total power' but they do now, total and complete control and most of you MORONS still think there is GOP there. Ths BLATANT STUPIDITY of the LEFTIST fascist shits is INCOMPREHENSIBLE

The DEMS have 60 seats and are FILIBUSTER proof, which means they will do what they want to do, and F**K you, if YOU, little PEON if you dont like it.

HUSSEIN Obama has THIRTY TWO Czars (32). More than ANY OTHER admin. in the history of the United States, CZAR is a COMMUNIST term that means ABSOLUTE POWER, THAT is what HUSSEIN Obama is doing, and you are a damned DOLT.

Kirk, when you have NO food, dont come crying to ME, b/c I PROMISE that I will tell you:

I TOLD YOU SO.

this post was put up in response to all liberal fascist before you ever commented on it,that other people feel the need to respond is their judgement not mine,like i said i dont censor very much if at all, feel free to respond to her...it will slowly scrowl up and your name will pass into the fog.or i will post another blog. maybe one about your leader checking out 16 year old girls that might get some remarks that will make people forget all about this one.
I was replying to your comment, not hers.

tyranny---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------anarchy

left--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------right

absolute government--------------------------------------------------absolutly no government

slavery------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------liberty

You do not get to change the language to promote your ideaology. It is impossible for tyranny to exist on the right. There would be no civilization whatsoever. Extremism on the right is anarchy, extremism on the left is tryannyThat is why some government is required. The question is, how much government.

The more government you have, the less liberty you have.

Look at the Constitution of the United States as an example. Under the Articles of Confederation, the states surrendered so little liberty that the central government was powerless and effectively no government existed. The Constitution created a central government with sufficient power to carry out its purposes in its creation. This did require the states to surrender more liberty.

In todays parlance progressiveism (liberalism) is the movement which advocates for more government, less liberty. Conservatism seeks to stop this creep toward more government and try to move toward more liberty.

kirk,that you stole my beach picture,and my picture of ann coulter comes as no surprise i expect nothing less. or actully i expect alot less,so i'm not all that surprised.that you can't see what obama and the democratic party are doing also comes as no surprise.that they control the white house and congress and still want to play the victim,the party that is working against the system is amazing.truly,astoundingly amazing.how much more of their poor me tantrum do you think america will put up with.that you have said goodbye,what 4 times now and keep coming back doesn't make any sense,if you want to comment here i have no problem with,but don't expect your liberal fascist poor me tantrums to be allowed with out a response.that marxist thinking doesn't fly here.

Bill whatever the fk ever your name is:

You are a HUGE PATSY. As are MOST liberal men, YOU ARE CONTROLLED by feminazis and have bought the BS.

YOU have TESTOSTERONE.....

USE IT.

For a CHANGE we can believe in.

'Ann Coulter is a disgusting bigot, a wanna-be shock jock'

YOU are an ASS. Ann is a bigot, on WHAT grounds.

'ken, I told you I was going to leave you alone, and I meant it. You can stop baiting me now'. LOL! 'Kenny...O-M-G..you are so mean, and I am such a PATSY! Please leave me be, because I cant handle the TRUTH!'

"I am going to REPORT you all the the YES WE CAN camp, because you fight for American, you fight for freedom and liberty, and me, KIRK, wants to destroy it!"

Ken you are a huge WHINER. You are NOT a man, you are a cowardly, snivelling, little PUTZ.

MAN UP for crying out loud and STOP EMBARASSING YOURSELF!

Whoops, I meant KIRK the little itty biyy PUTZ.

Kirk, you are a WEAK debater. I dont know why you are so weak. Where do you live?? In never never land? Why do you VOMITOUS SNAKE LIBERALS try to make a utopia?? Life is NOT a utopia, it is NOT fair, and NOBODY EVER said it would be easy. There are WARS all over, and all of this is PROMISED from the Bible OVER 2000 years ago:

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=62&chapter=3&version=31

1But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. 2People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, 4treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— 5having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with them.

And the book of JUDE tells us how to deal with you, SO GET USED TO IT:

The sin and doom of Godless men

17But, dear friends, remember what the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ foretold. 18They said to you, "In the last times there will be scoffers who will follow their own ungodly desires." 19These are the men who divide you, who follow mere natural instincts and do not have the Spirit.

20But you, dear friends, build yourselves up in your most holy faith and pray in the Holy Spirit. 21Keep yourselves in God's love as you wait for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to bring you to eternal life.

22Be merciful to those who doubt; 23snatch others from the fire and save them; to others show mercy, mixed with fear—hating even the clothing stained by corrupted flesh.

We HAVE to scare the HELL out of YOU, if we dont YOU WILL GO THERE

MadbatshitJewess:Take your Thorazine like a good girl and go away.And take your "shouting" with you.
ah pizza girl,if only there was a pill for that most invasive of aliments of yours,the we would all get a good night's sleep
No, Ken, if you were to suddenly be banned from Vox, *that* would be a good thing.Along with all your Conservatroll friends.
you need to look above at the title of the post, then wonder where you are,and then come to the understanding that you are the poster child of what this post is all about.and then maybe you will start to find a cure for your aliment...good luck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
piecesofGALL- SURE NO PROBLEM I WILL COME YOU YOUR BLOG, you RACIST.
now i was thinking just the other day that it is always the consevatives that get tired of hearing you whine, that they go and find a new place to hang their hat,but damm if those liberals don't follow and within a couple of years they declare it's their's and they want the conservatives gone.i think if just once we killed all the poor me liberals 99% of the world problems would just go away.not to mention how much more sane it would be..

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Advertisement